Skip to content
Rohit Anand

Engineering case study

Building an Enterprise Voice AI Platform for 24×7 Customer Engagement

LLMsVoiceAI Platform

As Engineering Director, I lead Birdeye’s enterprise Voice AI platform to transform customer operations: automate repetitive conversations, increase 24×7 engagement and conversion opportunities, and keep human handoff for complex issues—with latency, evaluation, and reliability treated as product requirements.

A business transformation case for customer operations—24×7 engagement, lower cost-to-serve, and revenue-facing voice experiences enterprises can trust.

Enterprises adopt AI when they can trust it—not simply because it’s impressive.

Why the business funded this

Enterprise customer support and inbound engagement are expensive to scale and constrained by human availability. Voice AI was funded to cut operational overhead, unlock 24×7 engagement, and improve conversion on sales and onboarding journeys—on products contributing to $100M+ ARR.

My role

Engineering Director

Team

40+ engineers

Duration

Ongoing platform leadership

Business goal

24×7 AI customer engagement

Primary outcome

Production Voice AI platform

My contribution

Architecture · Leadership · Execution

Responsible for

  • Architecture
  • Technical roadmap
  • Cross-team delivery
  • Hiring & mentoring
  • Stakeholder alignment
  • Platform standards
  • Risk & reliability

$100M+

ARR platform

40+

Engineers enabled

24×7

Availability

Enterprise

AI systems

Engineering timeline

  1. Business opportunity
  2. Customer problem
  3. Platform architecture
  4. Trust & evaluation bars
  5. Production delivery
Voice AISpeech-to-TextText-to-SpeechLLMsTool callingPrompt versioningPythonTypeScriptAWSGCP
Building an Enterprise Voice AI Platform for 24×7 Customer Engagement visual

Business

Potential business impact

  • 24×7 customer availability beyond business-hours staffing
  • Reduced repetitive support workload for human agents
  • Faster first response time on common intents
  • Better lead qualification and demo / appointment scheduling
  • Lower operational costs as automation absorbs high-volume conversations
  • Scalable customer engagement without linear hiring

Why this problem mattered

Enterprise customer support is expensive, difficult to scale, and constrained by human availability. As businesses grow globally, customers expect immediate responses regardless of time zone or business hours.

Modern Voice AI enables organizations to automate a significant portion of customer interactions while maintaining natural conversations. Instead of replacing support teams, it lets them focus on complex issues by handling repetitive conversations, qualifying leads, answering common questions, scheduling appointments, and routing requests automatically.

Enterprise Voice AI is not only a cost optimization initiative—it also improves customer engagement and revenue generation. AI agents can answer sales inquiries instantly, qualify leads, schedule demos, recover abandoned interactions, and guide customers through onboarding, allowing businesses to increase conversion while maintaining 24×7 availability.

For enterprise SaaS, that combination means lower operational overhead, faster responses, higher support capacity without linear hiring, and new conversion opportunities on products contributing to $100M+ ARR. Voice AI had to be a dependable business capability, not an experiment.

Customer operations context

Enterprise customer operations were constrained by business hours, wait times, and repetitive manual conversations. Birdeye’s Voice AI platform is the production foundation for speech experiences that automate common interactions—answering questions, qualifying leads, scheduling, and routing—while escalating complex cases to humans.

The platform owns telephony ingress, speech-to-text, conversation orchestration, model interaction, enterprise tools, CRM integration, text-to-speech, monitoring, and human fallback so product teams can ship voice journeys without reinventing the speech stack.

Delivery

Constraints

  • Low end-to-end latency across STT → LLM → TTS
  • Interruptible speech (barge-in) for natural turn-taking
  • Hallucination prevention and grounded tool use
  • Enterprise data privacy and multi-tenant isolation
  • Cost per conversation must stay economically viable
  • Reliable tool / API execution for workflows
  • Clear human escalation for complex or sensitive cases
  • Observability and continuous evaluation across the conversation path

Leadership

Cross-functional collaboration

Voice AI only ships when Product, Design, Support operations, Sales ops, and Engineering share the same definition of “production ready.”

  • Partnered with Product on journeys that change cost-to-serve and conversion—not novelty demos
  • Aligned Design on conversational UX: latency, barge-in, and escalation moments
  • Coordinated platform and product squads on tool contracts and CRM integrations
  • Kept executives focused on availability, cost, revenue impact, and trust—not model brand names

Judgment

AI platform principles

  • AI augments people—it does not replace them by default.
  • Human handoff is a first-class product feature.
  • Latency matters as much as intelligence.
  • Reliability is more important than model choice.
  • Observability is mandatory for production AI.
  • Every AI workflow should be measurable—success, cost, and escalation.

Engineering goals

  • Deliver conversations customers trust
  • Reduce human workload through safe automation
  • Support enterprise-scale deployments across products
  • Enable rapid creation of new AI voice agents
  • Maintain sub-second conversational latency where the path allows
  • Provide observability and human fallback as first-class features

Architecture

Each layer exists to make conversations feel instant, actions reliable, and escalation safe—not to showcase models in isolation.

Customer speech flows through telephony and STT into a conversation engine that calls an LLM with enterprise tools, writes back to CRM, synthesizes speech, and returns audio—with monitoring, evaluation, and human fallback as first-class paths.

  1. Customer
  2. TelephonyCall ingress / egress
  3. Speech-to-TextStreaming transcription
  4. Conversation EngineOrchestration, memory, policies
  5. LLMIntent, reasoning, responses
  6. Enterprise ToolsDeterministic workflows
  7. CRMEnterprise data & actions
  8. Text-to-SpeechNatural spoken reply
  9. Customer

AI systems

Evaluation strategy

Production Voice AI lives or dies by evaluation. Model quality alone is not enough—conversation success, task completion, latency, hallucination risk, cost, and escalation quality decide whether the business case holds.

Task completion

Did tools complete the job—lookup, schedule, route, qualify—correctly?

Conversation success

Did the interaction resolve the customer’s intent without confusion or loops?

Latency

End-to-end and perceived turn latency across STT → LLM → TTS.

Tool success rate

Reliability of enterprise tool / API execution under real traffic.

Hallucination / groundedness

Ungrounded claims and unsafe actions caught before they reach customers.

Escalation rate

How often—and how cleanly—the system hands off to a human.

Customer satisfaction signals

Experience quality on completed and escalated conversations.

Cost per conversation

Unit economics so automation remains viable as volume grows.

AI systems

AI observability

If you cannot inspect a conversation end-to-end, you cannot operate Voice AI in production. Observability is how latency, cost, tool failures, and escalations become actionable.

Conversation traces

Full path visibility from telephony through STT, orchestration, tools, and TTS.

Prompt versions

Which prompt template and policy version produced each turn.

Tool execution logs

Inputs, outputs, latency, and failure modes for enterprise tools.

Latency dashboards

Per-hop and end-to-end latency so regressions are visible quickly.

Failure analysis

Structured diagnosis for timeouts, tool errors, and degraded speech quality.

Human escalation monitoring

When, why, and how often conversations leave the AI path.

Migration

Migration phases

  1. Phase 1

    Business opportunity

    Where automation changes cost-to-serve, experience, and conversion.

  2. Phase 2

    Platform spine

    Telephony → STT → conversation engine → LLM → tools → CRM → TTS.

  3. Phase 3

    Trust & evaluation bars

    Latency, barge-in, guardrails, escalation, observability, eval loops.

  4. Phase 4

    Product integration

    Wire into SaaS workflows and CRM actions.

  5. Phase 5

    Operate & improve

    Regression evals, cost control, reliability drills.

Engineering

Key results

24×7 customer engagementCost + revenue business caseEvaluation & human handoffReusable Voice AI platform

Judgment

What didn't work

Treating Voice AI as a model demo problem

Problem

Demos ignore latency, barge-in, hallucinations, cost, evaluation, and enterprise integration—none of which customer ops or revenue teams can tolerate.

Decision

Shifted ownership to platform standards: production bars, tool contracts, evaluation, and human escalation.

Moved to

Architecture and delivery discipline around real call paths and business outcomes.

Key engineering decisions

Why streaming instead of waiting for full responses?

Problem

Customers experience lag as product failure, even if the final answer is correct.

Why

Streaming across STT / LLM / TTS lowers perceived latency and makes turn-taking feel natural.

Pros

  • Lower perceived latency
  • More natural conversations
  • Better stay-on-call rates

Cons

  • More implementation complexity
  • Harder partial-failure handling

Trade-offs

Higher orchestration complexity in exchange for conversations people stay on.

Result

Latency stayed a first-class shipping bar, not polish.

Why streaming + tool orchestration instead of sending every request straight to the LLM?

Problem

Naive “every turn → full LLM call” designs burn tokens, inflate cost, and still fail on enterprise actions.

Why

Orchestration can short-circuit, cache, or route to tools before paying for expensive inference—and make actions reliable.

Pros

  • Lower latency on common paths
  • Reduced token usage and inference cost
  • Better reliability for enterprise workflows

Cons

  • More engineering complexity
  • Clear ownership of routing policies

Trade-offs

More platform investment; stronger unit economics and trust.

Result

Cost and latency became controllable platform properties—not accidents of prompting.

Why tool calling instead of prompting alone?

Problem

Enterprises need Voice AI to take reliable actions—schedule, route, look up—not only sound fluent.

Options

Prompting alone

Rejected because: Unstructured outputs, weak auditability, unreliable workflow execution.

Tool calling with structured outputs· Chosen

Chosen because: Deterministic workflows, clearer auditing, and safer enterprise actions.

Decision

Prompt-only flows are hard to audit, easy to hallucinate, and brittle for multi-step workflows.

Trade-offs

More platform complexity; far more trustworthy actions in production.

Result

Conversations can complete real work—not only chat.

Why versioned prompt templates?

Problem

Ad-hoc prompts create silent regressions when models, tools, or policies change.

Why

Templates make prompts operable—reviewable, evaluable, and releasable like code.

Pros

  • Easier evaluation
  • Safer model upgrades
  • Clear ownership

Cons

  • More maintenance
  • Discipline required across teams

Trade-offs

Slightly more process; dramatically better change control.

Result

Conversation quality becomes a managed system, not tribal knowledge.

Why human handoff as a product feature?

Problem

Edge cases, sensitive issues, and regulatory risk make full automation the wrong default.

Why

Enterprise trust requires graceful escalation—not trapping customers in a broken loop.

Pros

  • Enterprise trust
  • Better outcomes on complex issues
  • Safer compliance posture

Cons

  • Needs clear escalation UX and routing rules

Trade-offs

Slightly lower automation rate; much higher willingness to deploy Voice AI.

Result

AI handles repetitive load; humans own judgment-heavy work.

Why a platform over one-off voice features?

Problem

Multiple products needing speech without shared foundations.

Why

One-off builds recreate latency, guardrail, evaluation, and reliability bugs in every squad.

Pros

  • Reuse
  • Consistent quality bar
  • Faster new agents

Cons

  • Upfront platform investment

Trade-offs

Slower first demo; faster second and third voice experiences.

Result

Voice capability compounds across the org.

Challenges I had to solve

Challenge

End-to-end latency across STT → LLM → TTS makes conversations feel broken if any hop stalls.

Solution

Streaming paths, latency budgets per turn, and production bars treated as release criteria.

Result

Voice work judged by conversational feel, not only answer quality.

Challenge

Hallucination detection and ungrounded claims destroy enterprise trust.

Solution

Prefer tool-backed actions, constrain prompts, and escalate when confidence or policy requires it.

Result

Fewer fluent-but-wrong outcomes in customer-facing calls.

Challenge

Prompt versioning and LLM model upgrades create silent regressions.

Solution

Versioned prompt templates, evaluation suites, and controlled model rollout.

Result

Changes to models and prompts become operable releases.

Challenge

Multi-turn memory and context window management break long conversations.

Solution

Explicit context policies in the conversation engine—what to keep, summarize, or drop.

Result

Longer conversations stay coherent without unbounded cost.

Challenge

Barge-in and interruptible speech are hard—and non-negotiable for natural voice UX.

Solution

Design turn-taking and cancellation into the conversation engine, not as a late UX patch.

Result

Customers can interrupt and redirect without fighting the system.

Challenge

Cost per conversation and tool reliability determine whether automation is economical.

Solution

Instrument cost and tool success rates alongside latency; design for recoverable tool failures.

Result

Platform decisions stay grounded in unit economics and reliability.

Challenge

Conversation evaluation is easy to postpone until production pain forces it.

Solution

Treat evaluation as a platform capability from the start—success, task completion, escalation, CSAT signals.

Result

Quality and business value stay measurable as volume grows.

Delivery

Risk mitigation

RiskMitigation
Demo-quality onlyProduction latency, barge-in, and reliability bars
Hallucinated actionsTool calling, guardrails, human escalation
Silent prompt / model regressionsVersioned templates + evaluation
Privacy / tenancy issuesEnterprise isolation and data policies
Cost blowupsPer-conversation cost observability
One-off product forksShared platform ownership

Trust & reliability

Treat recovery, monitoring, evaluation, and escalation as architecture—not afterthoughts.

Integration risk

Clear contracts between conversation engine, tools, CRM, and product surfaces.

Org risk

Hiring and mentoring so ownership isn’t hero-dependent as AI systems evolve.

Organization

Engineering leadership

Director work here is platform leadership with a business mandate: cost-to-serve, conversion, and production trust.

40+

Engineers

Voice platform

Focus

Cross-functional

Planning

Voice AI is a cost and revenue initiative—not a model showcase.

Technical roadmap

Sequence platform capabilities against journeys that change cost and revenue.

Cross-team delivery

Keep platform and product squads shipping without thrash.

Hiring & mentoring

Build owners for production AI systems—not only feature tickets.

Stakeholder communication

Frame progress as availability, automation, conversion, and enterprise trust—not model demos.

Outcomes

Customer outcomes

Availability

24×7 conversational engagement beyond business hours

Support experience

Faster first response and clearer resolution paths

Trust

Complex issues still reach humans cleanly

Business outcomes

Cost-to-serve

Lower operational cost as repetitive work is automated safely

Automation

Increased automation on high-volume conversational intents

Revenue motion

Better lead qualification and 24×7 sales / onboarding engagement

Capacity

Higher support capacity without linear hiring

Engineering outcomes

Platform

Shared Voice AI platform across speech products

Agent framework

Reusable orchestration for faster new AI experiences

Delivery

Faster rollout of new voice agents with shared trust bars

Team outcomes

Ownership

Cross-team platform execution with clear contracts

Leadership

Roadmap, hiring, and stakeholder alignment on business outcomes

Transformation

What changed for customer operations

BeforeAfter
Support mainly during business hours24×7 AI conversational availability
Long waits and repetitive manual conversationsInstant engagement on common intents
Human-only conversationsAI-first with human escalation
Limited scalability without hiringScales support capacity without linear headcount
Sales / onboarding limited by agent availabilityAlways-on qualification and scheduling opportunities
Voice as demo / one-off featureVoice as enterprise platform capability

Leadership lessons

  • Fund Voice AI for cost, revenue, and experience—not novelty.
  • Treat latency, evaluation, barge-in, and escalation as product requirements.
  • Platform beats one-offs when multiple products need speech.
  • Director leverage is standards + people + sequencing around production trust.

What I'd do differently

  • Instrument conversation-quality evals even earlier alongside latency and cost.
  • Publish integration and escalation playbooks sooner for product teams.

Where it goes next

Continue strengthening Voice AI as a trusted business platform:

  • Tighter latency and cost observability per conversation turn
  • Stronger evaluation for conversation quality, task completion, and tool success
  • Deeper product and CRM integrations for revenue journeys
  • Harder reliability drills for failure and escalation paths

Biggest takeaway

Voice AI wins when it lowers cost-to-serve, grows engagement, and earns trust
on a platform that makes reliability boring.

Key takeaways

  • Enterprise Voice AI is a business transformation—cost, revenue, and experience—not an LLM demo.
  • Trust is the product: latency, reliability, evaluation, guardrails, and human fallback.

Final reflection

Building enterprise Voice AI reinforced that successful AI systems are engineered, not prompted. Enterprises don’t adopt AI because it is impressive—they adopt it because it is reliable, measurable, secure, and capable of improving customer experience without sacrificing trust.


← All projects